RECEIPTS
REPORT 39941 · 82 out of 100
aboutmethodologypull your own
contactprivacyterms

Receipts evidence report for asksensei.dev: scored 82 out of 100, Reasonable evidence trail. Pulled 2026-06-27 at 02:47 UTC.

Receipts

evidence report


Scanned
asksensei.dev
Date
2026-06-27 · 02:47 UTC
Report
39941
Impression
no. 13

  • Domain history100
  • Social proof100
  • Footprint50
  • Fingerprints100
  • Operational60

Total
evidence
82

REASONABLE
EVIDENCE TRAIL

A record of evidence found and evidence missing, at scan time.
Not an accusation. Not a verdict.

17 checks · 2 found no corroboration · 2 could not run.
The full evidence is on the table below. read it ↓

This receipt was pulled on asksensei.dev.

2026-06-27, 02:47 UTC.

replay · 5 pulls
  • fetched asksensei.dev … ok
  • crawled 5 pages … homepage + 4 internal
  • registry … Domain registered 2026-03-08 (110 days before this scan).
  • flagged … Page claims "Run one prompt across GPT‑5, Claude & Gemini — get one merged answer. 11,400 runs this week.". Domain is 110 days old. Possible, but this combination raises the bar for independent footprint.
  • flagged … Legal pages exist but reference an inconsistent identity: The Terms of Service and Privacy Policy reference the operating company as 'Schmade LLC', while the site presents under the brand name 'Sensei' / 'Ask Sensei' at asksensei.dev, and the footer reads 'Built by SCHMADE' — the legal entity name does not match the primary product/brand name displayed to users..

17 checks. 2 found no corroboration in the public record. 2 could not run.

The evidence is on the table.

Not corroborated

2 findings
  • Page claims "Run one prompt across GPT‑5, Claude & Gemini — get one merged answer. 11,400 runs this week.". Domain is 110 days old. Possible, but this combination raises the bar for independent footprint.footprint · Claim vs. age

  • Legal pages exist but reference an inconsistent identity: The Terms of Service and Privacy Policy reference the operating company as 'Schmade LLC', while the site presents under the brand name 'Sensei' / 'Ask Sensei' at asksensei.dev, and the footer reads 'Built by SCHMADE' — the legal entity name does not match the primary product/brand name displayed to users..operational · Legal pages

Full evidence

17 checks · 5 trails · 5 pages read

Domain and history

100
  • Registration records form a coherent timeline (registration 2026-03-08, first archive capture 2026-05-08). RegistryWayback Machinefound
  • Few Wayback captures so far (1). Consistent with a newer or low-traffic site. Wayback Machinefound
  • Domain registered 2026-03-08 (110 days before this scan).found
  • Registrant details are public in the registry record.found
  • The site makes no tenure or establishment claim, so history has nothing to support or contradict.n/a

Social proof integrity

100
  • Traction claims carry specific, falsifiable figures (e.g. "One of 267 readings delivered.").found

Footprint corroboration

50
  • Page claims "Run one prompt across GPT‑5, Claude & Gemini — get one merged answer. 11,400 runs this week.". Domain is 110 days old. Possible, but this combination raises the bar for independent footprint.not found
  • Found 4 GitHub repositories. GitHubfound

Generation fingerprints

100
  • No builder tool markers detected in page source.found
  • Landing copy reads as partially templated with original detail. The copy uses distinctive, stylized voice with concrete product-specific language and named examples, which is less consistent with generic AI-generated landing page patterns.found
  • Page structure does not match the canonical generated landing layout.found

Operational reality

60
  • Legal pages exist but reference an inconsistent identity: The Terms of Service and Privacy Policy reference the operating company as 'Schmade LLC', while the site presents under the brand name 'Sensei' / 'Ask Sensei' at asksensei.dev, and the footer reads 'Built by SCHMADE' — the legal entity name does not match the primary product/brand name displayed to users..not found
  • No contact email or support link was visible. A private contact channel is normal, so this is recorded as could-not-verify.could not check
  • A live payment provider is referenced from the site's purchase path.found
  • No named person found on the site. Could not assess.could not check
  • A changelog or blog exists with 12 dated entries.found
  • The site serves robots.txt and a sitemap.xml.found

Could not check: Contact surface, Founder presence. Evidence found and not found at scan time; not an accusation, not a verdict. If this is your site, fix what's flagged and rescan · removal: hello@getreceipts.dev.

Share this receipt

On file. This receipt is part of the frozen archive at recent.

preserved exactly as the engine wrote it · to send it to someone.

pull another from the archive · enter sends this URL to the retired scanner